Einsteinian scientists still refuse to accept any other reasons apart from distance to explain this red shift in galaxies, even after quasar anomalies put distance into question. Cosmologists who wouldn't dare to question Einstein's dogmatic mainstream theories of gravitation had to invent dark matter, black holes, and dark energy to account for all of the missing mass in our universe. Einstein's theories simply do not work in the construction of a galaxy, therefore cosmologists fill in his blanks with their imaginary fantasies of dark matter and dark energy.
As an example, Einstein's Cross shows four distinct sources of light in a quasar and cosmologists state that there are numerous black holes intertwined around this galaxy that are causing the light to appear as it does. Einstein predicted that light from a distant object that was gravitationally warped around a massive foreground object would form arcs or even a full circle. Here we see four bright spots and no ring-like elongations. In fact, all four of the bright spots are elongated in the wrong direction: they stretch toward the galaxy centre. Also, these four sources of light change in brightness during short periods of time, making the black hole theory crumble to pieces. Einstein's Cross clearly shows that quasars are embedded in galaxies, and more so, there is no bending of light.
More observations were undertaken using the Hubble Space Telescope, wherein a friend of Arp's documented that quasar D (right) is physically connected to the nucleus of the galaxy. Later, a high redshift connection was discovered between quasars A (bottom) and B (top) which passes in front of the connection between the nucleus and quasar D. But these observations went unnoticed: the journal which usually prints results from the Hubble Space Telescope rejected this announcement twice.
Mathematical analysis, too, casts doubt on the gravitational lens theory. The faint foreground galaxy would need to be much bigger and brighter in order to accomplish this lensing feat: In fact, it would have to be two magnitudes brighter than "conventional quasars," the brightest objects known.
Ring systems are explained by Einsteinian cosmologists by using gravitational lens. However, they fail to recognize these objects as simple ring galaxies without gravity being the cause of the ring of light. It is proposed that the gravity of the sun bends light. However, while studying a solar eclipse in 1919, scientists found that there were also numerous stars whose light were not being bent. Furthermore, numerous other galaxies (i.e. Andromeda) do not exhibit this lensing. Even our own supposed black hole at the centre of our supposed galaxy does not bend light. Should it not be refracting light much more so than our sun? Through simple scientific observation, this clearly goes against the gravitational lensing theory. We must seriously ask ourselves, does gravity really bend space and light?
When bending of light is seen around the sun, is Einstein's gravity the only explanation for this phenomenon? It turns out that it is not. If we accept an electric sun that is powered externally (plasma theory), which has external plasma fields, we would also get this bending of light, without a gravitational explanation. In fact, science has shown that ionized moving gas from a plasma source does appear to bend light. Therefore, visual distortions of light around the sun could have a lot to do with moving energy, and not gravity.Big Bang theorists suggest that matter exploded into random directions in space with varying velocities, which means that there would be no quantized red shifts. However, while studying quasars in galaxies, we find quantized red shifts with discrete intervals. This could only make sense using a Big Bang model if the earth were at the centre of the universe, which has not been disproved either.
Therefore, the Hubble Law has been falsified and the red shift (according to quasar studies) does not prove that the universe is expanding, while the Big Bang is a figment of the imagination. Such scientists supporting these false claims come up with science fiction theories that are pushed into the mainstream media and shoved down people's throat using public funding.
The Big Bang that was proposed by a Catholic priest, paved the way for Darwinian thinking and evolution, where the origin of life could be fantasized to occur by mere random chance. According to Einstein theorists, we live in a universe where there is 95% of matter (dark) we simply cannot detect. The theories put forth by scientists today are not science, but rather a set of religious beliefs that crumble in the face of modern discoveries. Like religious priests, scientific authorities would have us believe that we are too dumb to understand these cosmological theories and claims to be able to make sense of them. According to them, we simply do not possess the Math or Physics to be able to understand their theories.
With Einstein theorists left to only work with the force of gravity, they have dismissed electrical forces that are at work in the universe. As a result, they have invented the Big Bang, expanding universe, dark matter, and black holes to be able to construct a galaxy, which in the end still doesn't hold together. If scientists were to hear out Dr. Halton Arp's electric theory of the universe and learn more about electromagnetic forces and plasma cosmology found in peer-reviewed scientific literature, perhaps they would come closer to understanding the divine truths behind our universe.
Halton Arp, the award-winning American astronomer and protégé of Edwin Hubble, who has died aged 86, wrote a widely-used text, the Atlas of Peculiar Galaxies (1966); yet in the middle of his career he found himself attacked by his fellow scientists and was eventually forced to pursue his studies in exile, after he dared to question the publicly-funded Big Bang theory of the universe.
Please check out our mind-blowing documentary, entitled Drills Hoaxes & Crisis Actors - From Shootings to NASA & Space. You can find and download the full video here.
Also See:
The Electric Sky and Pseudo-Science of Today's Cosmic Theories
No comments:
Post a Comment