The Electric Sky and Pseudo-Science of Today's Cosmic Theories

There is a revolution just beginning in astronomy/cosmology that will rival the one set off by Copernicus and Galileo. This revolution is based on the growing realization that the cosmos is highly electrical in nature. It is becoming clear that 99% of the universe is made up not of "invisible matter", but rather, of matter in the plasma state. Electrodynamic forces in electric plasmas are much stronger than the gravitational force.

Mainstream astrophysicists are continually “surprised” by new data sent back by space probes and orbiting telescopes. That ought to be a clue that something is wrong. New information always sends theoretical astrophysicists "back to the drawing board". In light of this, it is curious that they have such "cock-sure" attitudes about the infallibility of their present models. Those models seem to require major "patching up" every time a new space probe sends back data.

Astrophysicists and astronomers do not study experimental plasma dynamics in graduate school. They rarely take any courses in electrodynamic field theory, and thus they try to explain every new discovery via gravity, magnetism, and fluid dynamics which is all they understand. It is no wonder they cannot understand that 99% of all cosmic phenomena are due to plasma dynamics and not to gravity alone.

When confronted by observations that cast doubt on the validity of their theories, astrophysicists have circled their wagons and conjured up pseudo-scientific invisible entities such as neutron stars, weakly interacting massive particles, strange energy, and black holes. When confronted by solid evidence such as Halton Arp's photographs that contradict the Big Bang Theory, their response is to refuse him access to any major telescope in the U.S.

Instead of wasting time in a futile battle trying to convince entrenched mainstream astronomers to seriously investigate the Electric/Plasma Universe ideas, a growing band of plasma scientists and engineers are simply bypassing them. A new electric plasma-based paradigm that does not find new discoveries to be “enigmatic and puzzling”, but rather to be predictable and consistent with an electrical point of view, is slowly but surely replacing the old paradigm wherein all electrical mechanisms are ignored. [Source]


Please check out our mind-blowing documentary, entitled Drills Hoaxes & Crisis Actors - From Shootings to NASA & Space. You can find and download the full video here.


Also See:

Quasars and Plasma Cosmology: Falsifying Einstein and Hubble, the BigBang and Dark Matter

The Scientific Wisdom of Ptolemy and Kepler's Scientific Forgery

Ptolemy's geocentric model of our orbital system uses epicycles, which helps explains retrograde motion of Mars, and phase / size changes of Venus. Interestingly, Ptolemy's orbits almost resemble the Fibonacci sequence seen in a young sunflower.

Copernicus used many of Ptolemy's concepts in his simplified heliocentric model, but he left out the complicated epicycles. He also used perfect circles for the orbits that he claimed circled the sun.

When scientific authorities began to realize that Copernicus' model did not work, John Kepler later came along and made the orbits elliptical, in order to support the heliocentric model. His data was fabricated, according to New York Times. With the new Kepler orbits, Isaac Newton then introduces his gravitational laws to further support the heliocentric theory.

New York Times reports:

Done in 1609, Kepler's fakery is one of the earliest known examples of the use of false data by a giant of modern science. The discovery was made by Dr. Donahue, a science historian, while translating Kepler's master work, ''Astronomia Nova,'' or ''The New Astronomy,'' into English. Dr. Donahue, who lives in Sante Fe, N.M., described his discovery in a recent issue of The Journal of the History of Astronomy. The fabricated data appear in calculated positions for the planet Mars, which Kepler used as a case study for all planetary motion. Kepler claimed the calculations gave his elliptical theory an independent check. But in fact they did nothing of the kind.

We must now ask ourselves, should we really believe Kepler and all the later scientific claims that are based on his model of the universe ?

Please check out our mind-blowing documentary, entitled Drills Hoaxes & Crisis Actors - From Shootings to NASA & Space. You can find and download the full video here.

Also See:

Did Kepler Murder Brahe and Skew his Data to Support Heliocentrism?

Rethinking Our Universe: From Galaxies, to Nebulae, to Orbits

Is it a coincidence that all of these planetary nebulae are facing directly towards earth? Perhaps we are being shown Ptolemy's orbital system in action. Ptolemy (top left) suggested that earth was at centre, with the sun and other bodies orbiting around in epicycles.

When one compares his model to these planetary nebulae, we note some striking similarities in the orbital systems. Ptolemy's model was considered far too complex by Copernicus, and did not go well with the sun-worshipping occult priests and authorities of that time.

However, we must ask ourselves: do we live in a milky way "galaxy", the one so clearly shown in photographs taken millions of light years away? How would such an image outside of our galaxy be photographed ? Is a nebula really what we think it is, considering that we have not seen a full lifespan?

Please check out our mind-blowing documentary, entitled Drills Hoaxes & Crisis Actors - From Shootings to NASA & Space. You can find and download the full video here.

Also See:

Sun Worship: The Origin of Heliocentrism?

Sun Worship: The Origin of Heliocentrism?

Copernicus was the one who proposed Heliocentrism, yet many are quick at pointing out Galileo. Scientific authorities are quick to say that the Church wanted to persecute Galileo, but how true does this statement hold? If that was the case, then why did the Pope present a gift of honour to the one who brought to him Copernicus' theory, stating that the earth revolves around the sun, and not vice-versa.

More importantly, we must take note of individuals that influenced Copernicus, who had only gone to school to obtain a degree in canon law (religious law). During this time, astrology, occult science, and Roman mythology were also rampant. Could there be a significant connection between sun worship and why this theory was heralded as ultimate truth? When one studies Egyptology and occult practices, we learn that High Priests during the time of Jesus worshipped the sun, as did Egyptian elites. As one example, Paul (Saul) was largely influenced by the Mithras religion, and hence today we are left with the solar calendar and Sunday for worship, as was decided by elites at the Council of Nicaea. Constantine was keen on promoting sun worship, which had its place in Greek and Roman mythological gods. Symbols of sun worship can also be found today, littered throughout the media and music industry.

So what is our real reason to accept the sun as centre? Is it simply a matter of science and the creation of physical laws that are made appealing to the heliocentric theory? Perhaps it has a lot to do with old philosophical views that had no basis in science. Could it be a delusion created by authorities, who wish to deceive the masses, keeping the secrets of our universe hidden under a cloak of fabricated science theories. Perhaps time will tell.


Please check out our mind-blowing documentary, entitled Drills Hoaxes & Crisis Actors - From Shootings to NASA & Space. You can find and download the full video here.